Don’t Tell Me There’s Something Wrong with My M4 Carbine…

Like the quests of El Ingenioso Hidalgo don Quijote de la Mancha (Don Quixote), the U.S. Army’s Col. Doug Tamilio, PM for Soldier Weapons, moves forward in a quest for the carbine of the future. Much to Col. Tamilio’s credit, he is committed to a transparent and fair process, but emphatic in his position that a winner must score with a “knock out punch” against the incumbent M4.

The M4 controversy has its roots in two key areas; lethality and reliability. These concerns made their way through the media and ultimately into Congresses’ lap where they became inflamed and wrapped up in politics. However, is their anything seriously wrong with the M4 or M16 family of weapons?

In a series of posts, I will be discussing the lethality and reliability concerns. Are they real, or is Congress asking the Army to fight windmills.


This entry was posted in Weapon systems and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Don’t Tell Me There’s Something Wrong with My M4 Carbine…

  1. Chockblock says:

    Oh there are much better rifles out there. Even a new upper would be better than the current M-4/M-16 system. I’m a 14E and I HATE the Direct Gas of the M-16. It’s too fussy. Most of the world uses piston systems for a reason. Stoner’s design works great in the armory or on a range. The Army needs a new rifle for the battlefield.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s