Suppressors and the Decibel

Received an e-mail from a reader asking if I was opposed to sound meter measurements.

The short answer is NO.

 I am not opposed to that practice; however, I think the methodology used is flawed; were I designing a test scenario, my approach would be significantly different.

  • I would set up a test environment using nothing more than a chambered barrel  of the following lengths for a 5.56×45 can: 10.5″ 14.5″ 16″ 20″ for  7.62×51 : 18″ 20″ 24″ 26″. This eliminates any action related noise so the suppressor is isolated for the measurement.
  • All testing would be done in an anechoic chamber.
  • I would fire 5 groups of 10 rounds each through each barrel. I would also measure the results with and without a suppressor installed, using the appropriate mounts. The reason for at least 10 data points is to be able to perform a normal statistical analysis.
  • If I were testing just for the military I would use their specific ammunition, for example M855A1, M80 or M118LR.
  • I would tabulate the suppressed and unsuppressed results for each of the barrel lengths and provide the following data:
    1. Cartridge.
    2. Barrel Length.
    3. Unsuppressed measurement: db (SPL) ±  (computed using normal statistics).
    4. Suppressed measurement: db (SPL) ± (computed using normal statistics)
    5. Sound attenuation: (Unsuppressed – Suppressed) expressed in dB. 
This entry was posted in Suppressors and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s